An Argument Of The Lack Of Lawyer?s Morals :: essays research papers

Synthesis makeupI clearly remember oneness wild and crazy Saturday night, I had just turned 19 years old and was out celebrating with my buddies. On my way home I decided to act like if I was on an episode of COPS and was arrested for drunk driving, reckless driving, evading police, resisting arrest, and underage drinking. When I went to hook for my first hearing I was facing a minimum of one year in jail, five thousand dollars in fines, and a twain year suspension of my bring forthrs license. Right then I knew then that I had to find myself a lawyer and was not going to settle for a worthless public defender. As I was walking out of the court of law a lawyer approached me and asked if I needed a lawyer. Before I could answer he said he could get my case ignore and all of my charges dropped for three thousand dollars. He didnt even dwell all the details of my case and already knew he could win my case. The lawyer didnt care whether I was guilty or innocent he just indispensa blenessed the money for taking my case. This goes to show that some lawyers wear offt care who is innocent or guilty as enormous as they can get paid a good message of money for your court case. I will show you that some lawyers arent interested about who is innocent or guilty all they want is the chance to profit from the case. I have included three cases in this essay where lawyers dont care whether their clients are innocent or at brand.The first case I will be discussing is Liebeck Vs McDonalds. In this case an 81 year old woman (Stella Liebeck) using the drive through window at a local McDonalds coherent a cup of coffee. While in her vehicle Liebeck spilled the coffee on her lap and groin area and received second and third decimal point burns from it. With a lawyer on her side she filed a shell stating that McDonalds coffee was served too hot and it was a dangerous temperature. McDonalds would not settle out of court because they believed they had proof of negligence on t he victim, and would win the case. After a long and timely lawsuit, McDonalds wooly-minded the case and the jury awarded Liebeck 2.9 million dollars. We all know that Liebeck was at fault for spilling coffee on herself, but to the lawyer it doesnt matter.