Laboratory Informstion System for Academic Medical Center Coursework

testing ground Informstion System for Academic Medical Center - Coursework Examplepag). Also, it is more convenient to use considering the speed and the the great unwashed of data available in the system (Robinson n. pag). Lastly, it facilitates more efficient project management a adept service provider gives more detailed, responsive, and coordinated action in times of system errors or even, in the regular maintenance of the system. B. An example of a fully integrated solution is the HNA Millenium , a system make to automate electronic medical record, patient care ordering, review of resident orders, closed-loop medication management, health cultivation management, and access management (Krishna 18). For its research laboratory system component, it seeks to reduce the medium turn-around time for laboratory and radiology reports (The counterpart Project 117). Diagnostic results are judge to be made available to the physician within seconds by and by verification. Another exa mple of an integrated solution is Matrixs Tafnit ERP system, a comprehensive solution for laboratory functions. It installs the Autolab LIS that is used to issue referrals and obtain data for billing (Assuta Medical Centers n. pag). ... pag). Scenario 2 Detailed Requirements Document i. Stakeholders The near essential initiative in an organization is to provide the needs of its stakeholders--for without them stakeholders, an organization works as reliable as nothing. Incorporating radiology images into the Personal Health Record System would further advance this initiative and is expected to benefit various stakeholders. Below is the list of the prospective stakeholders with their corresponding needs 1. Patients- More than anyone else, they are the ones who would hope timely and easy access to services. Remarkably, patients today have low levels of tolerance for delayed or mixed-up reports and films. Patients minimum expectation that needs to be served is to receive quickly gene rated, readily available, and reliable radiological reports (Thrall). 2. Referring physicians- As much as possible, physicians would like to have timely access to patient information. For decades, film handling and spoken language systems for hard-copy reports have frustrated physicians because of these systems inefficiency and poor reliability (Thrall). 3. Hospitals- Primarily confronted with severe cost-cutting pressures, hospitals seek to find cost-cutting measures lowering the average lengths of stay, cutting the length of care-process cycle, as well as eliminating some unnecessary inpatient days. Interestingly, hospitals are eyeing on the radiology department to achieve the aforementioned objectives (Thrall). 4. Radiologists- Similar to physicians, these key stakeholders are also confronted with unreliable and ineffective hard-copy film management systems. A more improved infrastructure for practice-support and implementation of systems is vital for their tasks (Thrall). ii.